Comments for A Clatter of the Law

Comment on Law Society council ensures it can proceed without financial restraints by DoJ documents on solicitors’ insurance silent on bailout by Law Society « A Clatter of the Law

Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:07:53 +0000

[...] to the effect that they could give such a guarantee and that opinion was obtained. Some of us wondered if there were not legal or regulatory issues which could affect this guarantee, given by a de facto [...]

Comment on Law Society follows emergency guarantee fashion by DoJ documents on solicitors’ insurance silent on bailout by Law Society « A Clatter of the Law

Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:07:46 +0000

[...] late 2009 which was not dissimilar to that faced by the Irish banking sector in September 2008. I wrote about it in January 2010, outlining the chain of events that led to the Law Society guaranteeing a [...]

Comment on Does the home defence bill clarify the law? by MSK

MSK — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:43:40 +0000

So we can all agree that this area is in great need of reform. We know there is serious ambiguity when it comes to interpreting recent case law. This Bill I do not think is the answer! I wonder why Minster Dermot Ahern chose summer recess to publish this bill. I think it is lazy and reactionary policy making. The Nally case was a shambles for so many reasons and it s foolish to make policy on a case that was so extreme

Comment on Marriage by default and the Civil Partnership Bill 2009 by Does the home defence bill clarify the law? « A Clatter of the Law

Does the home defence bill clarify the law? « A Clatter of the Law — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:41:30 +0000

[...] However, given that it resembles the Fine Gael bills at the high level, it could attract a good deal of cross-party support and pass through the Oireacthas without detailed scrutiny of its wording. This happened recently with the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010, Part 15 of which did not receive significant textual scrutiny despite criticisms from leading academics that the provisions on cohabitants’ rights were poorly drafted, contained anomalies and could do more harm than good. [...]

Comment on Please note by aoife

aoife — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:04:50 +0000

i need to know

Comment on Please note by aoife

aoife — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:03:57 +0000

can u tell me fergal mawes address

Comment on Cohabitant rights on the way by David

David — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:02:24 +0000

I think that when it comes to cohabitants, that alone is a fine line and you have to worry about many things that are going to have to work in order for it to all fit into place.

Comment on Marriage by default and the Civil Partnership Bill 2009 by Cohabitant rights on the way « A Clatter of the Law

Cohabitant rights on the way « A Clatter of the Law — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:57:39 +0000

[...] written before about Part 15 of the Bill, which deals with cohabitants. This has received less attention, [...]

Comment on A known unknown in eircom’s “three strikes” system by Daragh O Brien

Daragh O Brien — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:43:49 +0000

Interesting point which I’ll admit I hadn’t considered. Perhaps the solution is a subject access request to IRMA requesting all personal data they hold associated with IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx?
Even a request to see if they ARE holding such data would be interesting.

Comment on Lesser known crimes: is that trade mark really registered? by Sunday reading. « BLITZKRIEG BOPP

Sunday reading. « BLITZKRIEG BOPP — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:03:02 +0000

[...] Lesser known crimes (trade marks) [...]