Comments on: Aftershock: legal profession http://aclatterofthelaw.com/2011/05/05/aftershock-legal-profession/ Law | Levities | Limerick Sun, 12 May 2013 12:34:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Rossa McMahon http://aclatterofthelaw.com/2011/05/05/aftershock-legal-profession/#comment-860 Fri, 06 May 2011 09:49:34 +0000 http://aclatterofthelaw.com/?p=1040#comment-860 Of course the official line is that they are separate and independent organisations, but it doesn’t seem to work that way when the SMDF gets into trouble.

]]> By: Fred http://aclatterofthelaw.com/2011/05/05/aftershock-legal-profession/#comment-859 Fri, 06 May 2011 08:04:54 +0000 http://aclatterofthelaw.com/?p=1040#comment-859 It worries me that the Law Society could control an insurance monopoly for the profession since this is the biggest cost for most and is also the most significant barrier to entry for new businesses.

This goes right against the IMF’s attempts to dilute and separate the powers of the Law Society.

]]>